A Tech-Legal practice uniting law, technology, and economics. We turn AI exposure and regulation (the EU AI Act) into a managed, defensible system, and back M&A, international transactions, and real estate and urban renewal. Over 20 years of transactional practice.
A product that runs a model, customers in Europe, and a regulation that took effect before the team had time to read it.
An administrative decision a system recommends has to explain itself, two years after it was made as well.
A transaction, a contract, or a dispute whose exposure is larger than the number written on it.
A home, a property, or an agreement whose signature changes your life. Here we check what the other side checked long ago.
Complex cases fail on the small things: a clause that slips, a deadline no one logged, an exposure flagged too late. We build the layer that catches them, pairing algorithmic legal and economic analysis with disciplined process.
Law, real estate, and AI in one place. We guide deals and buyers in Israel and abroad, represent owners and rights-holders, audit exposure and streamline contract drafting, and keep even the most complex matters under sharp, documented control.
Risk classification, GPAI obligations, and technical documentation, mapped into an orderly conformity matrix. For tech exporters and for M&A and VC due diligence, phased by obligation and risk tier.
For boards, executives, and CPAs: a conformity index and exposure matrix that price your algorithmic liability early, before a regulator or a claimant does.
A defensible IP layer around your technology and a secure, Privacy-by-Design data architecture: patents, trade secrets, and proprietary models.
Automated contract governance, counsel for startups and technology companies, funding rounds and founder agreements, and technology due diligence for deals.
For municipalities, ministries, and public tenders: explainable, bias-audited decision systems that withstand administrative petitions and State Comptroller review.
Decision-Oriented Mediation for AI, corporate, and regulatory disputes, and defense of automated decisions under challenge, on a defensible record.
Attorney & Notary · Ph.D. Law & Economics. Founder of LALUM. Over two decades in high-stakes governance and regulatory strategy, now at the Tech-Legal frontier where code, law, and economics meet, engineering signed AI conformity and algorithmic defense.
Author of the three-volume Guidebook on TAMA 38 Transactions (2020) and of Urban Renewal: A Practical Guide (2025). View full CV
Traditional firms advise on law without understanding a single line of code. We bridge this gap. As a Tech-Legal boutique, we operate at the intersection of advanced law, applied economics, and AI architecture. We understand your product, RAG systems, and database structures from day one, so your legal framework is designed to protect and strengthen your technological assets.
We implement strict Privacy-by-Design protocols. This includes establishing secure local environments (using open-source models) to prevent sensitive IP and customer data from leaking into public clouds. We also design robust AI usage policies to ensure your developers do not pollute your proprietary source code with third-party copyrighted material, which could otherwise jeopardize future funding or M&A.
It is our dual-force operational framework. The Clinic represents our knowledge, research, and elite advisory, where we conduct masterclasses, executive training, and draft bespoke legal strategies. The Engine is our execution and integration arm, where we build secure AI platforms, automate contract governance, and engineer the actual tech-legal infrastructure for your business.
We build the governance layer that public adoption demands: explainable decision systems, documented bias auditing, and a defensible record for every automated determination. The result withstands administrative petitions, freedom-of-information scrutiny, and State Comptroller review, so an authority can adopt AI without inviting the challenge that follows opaque, unaccountable systems.
DOM is our proprietary, 8-module dispute resolution framework designed for complex AI, corporate, and regulatory conflicts. Unlike traditional, drawn-out litigation or standard mediation, DOM is strictly time-bound, analytical, and highly structured. It combines law and economic modeling to drive the parties toward an optimal, legally binding settlement without draining organizational resources.
Yes. We specialize in proactive regulatory engineering. We perform algorithmic risk assessments and align your tech stack with the strictest global frameworks (including the EU AI Act and advanced privacy laws). We turn compliance from a bureaucratic hurdle into a competitive advantage that builds trust with enterprise clients.
Absolutely. We do not just write contracts; we engineer the systems that govern them. We assist organizations in building secure, internal AI platforms, custom vector databases, and automated contract workflows (Agentic Workflows) that manage and mitigate risks in real-time with zero friction.
We provide end-to-end legal and economic backing from inception to scale. This includes structuring sophisticated founders agreements, IP assignment, corporate governance, venture building, and representing the company in capital rounds (SAFE, Equity) and strategic M&A transactions.
Tech regulation is fundamentally economic. By applying rigorous Law & Economics principles, we do not just look at what is legally permissible; we model the financial and operational impact of legal structures on your business. The goal is a legal architecture that supports sustainable growth and protects company value.
We deliver highly specialized, actionable masterclasses and workshops for boards of directors, executive teams, and R&D departments. We translate complex tech-legal concepts, algorithmic risks, and shifting regulations into practical, business-oriented decision-making tools.
We begin with a strategic Tech-Legal Diagnostics session. In this initial meeting, we map your current technical architecture, corporate structure, and regulatory exposure to identify immediate vulnerabilities and design a tailored roadmap for your venture.
Yes. The developer's lawyer represents the developer. Owners and the committee need independent representation whose only client is them.
Bank guarantees, staged milestones, and the right termination and step-in clauses, all set before signing.
Before signing anything, ideally before the committee commits to a developer. The leverage is highest at the start.
Alongside local counsel, yes. An Israeli lawyer guards the deal end-to-end and keeps the protection with you, even where local-law advice is given abroad.
Importing Israeli assumptions. Title, holding structure, and taxation differ, and that gap is where deals break.
Before money moves. The holding and tax structure set before signing decides your real return and exposure.
No. It is an executive strategy and risk layer that works alongside your existing lawyer or litigator, not instead of them.
A results-oriented mediation model that drives disputes to a defensible resolution, often far faster than litigation.
It sharpens risk analysis and documentation. The lawyering stays human; the exposure map gets faster and more defensible.
ייעוץ נדל״ן והתחדשות עירונית · ייעוץ AI · ייעוץ משפטי · גישור ויישוב סכסוכים · מאמרים · שאלות ותשובות · מבדק מוכנות · תיאום פגישה